ViewZone: You have had many students of amygdala
"clicking" over the years, and you have undoubtedly kept up this
practice. Is there such a thing as too much pleasure seeking? Can
this practice be habitual or addictive?
Neil Slade: Deliberate pleasure seeking can be a tricky
business, especially when one does not understand the mechanisms
that lead to pleasure. Purely self-centered gratification that does
not involve "CICIL"
(cooperation-imagination-creativity-intuition-logic) frontal lobes
behaviors inevitably leads to a short circuiting of the pleasure
responses in the brain and amygdala, in the exact same way that
addictive narcotics fail to cause the desired effects, i.e. greater
amounts must be consumed to get high, tolerance builds up,
detrimental affects accumulate over time.
Clicking the amygdala is similar to the ignition switch on your
car, you have to turn it to get things running. But if you don't
leave the driveway, you won't get anywhere. Eventually you are going
to run out of gas, and I don't think they deliver.
As far as addictive amygdala clicking, it is a "positive"
addiction, like exercise, meditation, or running. You certainly
don't want to stop once you get the hang of it, and it promotes
health rather than depletes it. The trick in proper and continuing
amygdala positive response is to keep GROWING, rather than
re-running the same old programs. Nature rewards new life sustaining
thought and behavior with amygdala pleasure response.
Viewzone: How does this method influence other modes of
"altered states" such as drinking or smoking (including marijuana)
and drugs (both prescribed and illegal)?
Slade:Brain self-control produces similar effects to drugs
since one is using many of the same synaptic systems. However, there
are differences between internally self activated neurotransmitter
changes and those effected by use of external drugs. It is
impossible to generalize, since drugs themselves vary widely in
their effects and after effects. In the same way that one can
combine different drugs for different effects, one can combine self
brain stimulation with the infinite other external and internal
controls.
Viewzone: Do the effects diminish with time if the method
is not practiced?
Slade: Absolutely. What one is after is automatic and
habitual positive brain self-control. Once you've learned how to
ride a bike, you don't forget. Once you learn how to click forward,
you don't forget this either. Culturally we are not encouraged to
click forward, so that is why many people stop, or forget. If one is
very committed to learning about the brain, and helps others to
learn (cooperative intelligence), it sticks. If one is in it for
instant self-centered gratification only, this is pre-school
behavior, and positive effects will slip away rapidly.
Viewzone: Exactly how do you believe music and the
amygdala interact?
Slade: Music is a highly advanced primate brain and
frontal lobes process which demands circuiting of brain
electrochemical processes from lower brain functions into higher
brain functions. Forward amygdala clicking and the PRODUCTION of
music cannot be separated. One can, however, add negative thought
processes while creating music, and the sum total effect can be
zilch. (Nazi's forcing concentration camp inmates to play music.) In
general, however, music processing has been proven to improve
intelligence, learning and creativity. The degree to which this
happens depends on several factors, including type of music, and
culturally learned response and understanding of styles.
It should be noted that experienced musicians process music very
differently than non-musicians, and that the effect of music on
performing musicians can be much greater. Musicians process music as
a language, and it becomes a whole brain activity, rather than
limited to primarily right hemisphere regions as in lay persons.
Viewzone: Why is it that T.D.Lingo is not referenced in
the numerous on-line resources of amygdala info? How is he regarded
by the medical and scientific community?
Slade: Lingo was an independent behaviorist and
researcher. He functioned outside bow-tied academia and
conservatism. In the exact same way that the classical musical world
largely ignores or rejects outsiders, so goes the world of
institutionalized brain research. Never the less, they eventually
catch up, decades later. Lingo did work up to his PH.D. at the
University of Chicago, but reported that his own professors
encouraged him to strike out on his own research, and set up his own
program, which he did in Colorado in 1957.
In the years that followed, Lingo's writings on his work have
been embraced by both academics and professionals in the field.
Unfortunately, during his life, his independent work was not
published by any of the medical journals. Now that he is dead and
not actively promoting his ideas and research, there is no one but
me putting out the word. And frankly, I couldn't care less who
publishes or recognizes the work. I'm busy doing what I enjoy,
teaching, and playing music.
It should be emphasized that all of the data on brain
self-control published by either myself, or Lingo's previously, can
easily be confirmed by a little bit of library research. It is
surprising how few of my written claims are that far out or not
confirmed by numerous other foundation findings. It's just that most
people know almost nothing about how the brain works, so at first,
these claims may seem outrageous or overly optimistic to some.
Results of improved intelligence, creativity, pleasure, and even
incidental paranormal activity from brain self-control become
overwhelmingly convincing if not totally and ridiculously obvious
after just a little bit of research on the subject.
Viewzone: And the last question... what keeps you, Neil
Slade, involved in this?
Slade: The rewards of helping others learn about what is
possible with a bit of forward thinking amygdala clicking translates
directly into many things for me- all positively motivating for me
to continue. Positive results from others is instant pleasure
feedback re-circuiting into my brain, so I keep it up. Why stop a
good thing.